Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Want a better boys' regional tournament?

Once again, I'm proposing a change to the postseason format we use for high school basketball.

District tournaments, in this day and age, are almost obsolete. Most districts in the state are down to four teams — it isn't like the old days when districts had 10-12 schools and the tournament was a week-long party.

And not all districts are created equal. Some are much stronger than others, and I would make the argument that if we want the regional tournament to be a showcase for the best teams in the region, we come up with a format that allows more than two teams from the same district to advance to the next stage.

With that in mind, here is my idea, one for which I make an annual pitch.

In the 16-team First Region, with four teams in each of four districts, we continue to seed them as normal, with home-and-home, round-robin play.

The four top seeds will be seeded 1-4 in the 16-team regional field and will, as a reward, host a "district tournament." The four No. 2 seeds go in the 5-8 slots, with the rest of the region seeded 9-16.

Postseason rules apply, just as they do now. You win your first-round game and you're in the regional tournament. The second-round winners go into the regional tournament as "district champions" and meet a team that lost a second-round game in the regional quarterfinals.

Under the current format, the four top seeds are (in order of district) Fulton County, Paducah Tilghman, Graves County and Marshall County. For seeding purposes, I'm going to combine three power ratings services — the Louisville Courier-Journal's Litkenhous Ratings, the Lexington Herald-Leader's Cantrall Ratings and MaxPreps.com's Freeman Ratings.

Let's seed them this way:

1. Paducah Tilghman
2. Marshall County
3. Graves County
4. Fulton County

The four No. 2 seeds are (in order of district) Carlisle County, Heath, Ballard Memorial and Calloway County.

Let's seed them this way:

5. Heath
6. Ballard Memorial
7. Calloway County
8. Carlisle County

Now, the rest of the region:

9. St. Mary
10. Mayfield
11. Lone Oak
12. Murray
13. Fulton City
14. Hickman County
15. Reidland
16. Community Christian

That gives us these "district tournament" matchups:

at Fulton County — Fulton County vs. Fulton City, Heath vs. Murray

at Paducah Tilghman — Paducah Tilghman vs. Community Christian, Carlisle County vs. St. Mary

at Graves County — Graves County vs. Hickman County, Ballard Memorial vs. Lone Oak

at Marshall County — Marshall County vs. Reidland, Calloway County vs. Mayfield

In all honesty, this format could give us the same eight teams we'll see for real at Murray State University's CFSB Center. The biggest changes will be reflected on the girls' side, and we'll look at that on Thursday.

1 comment:

Unknown said...

Let's hope that the powers that be in Louisville and Lexington don't take this attitude toward the Sweet Sixteen tournament. The First Region would be without a representative at all in the state tournament most years. We both know if you took the top 16 ranked teams in the state, this end of KY would be left out, with very few exceptions.

I understand that from a fans point of view that it would make a better tournament. But it is not about the fans. It is about the high school athletes. ALL of them, not just the teams that get beat at the district tourney, thinking that they should get in anyway because they are better than a team from another district. We know the first round games at the regional are often not very competitive, and sometimes the second round. But the same could be said about the state tournament.

The example that you most often use is the Fourth district girls. No one will dispute that Marshall County was one of the better teams in the region, but not the best. Calloway and Murray survived, and I would bet if asked behind closed doors that they are both glad they don't have to deal with Marshall again at the regional. Another observation is that Murray and CCA have taken the hand that they have been dealt and used that as motivation to elevate their program to be able to compete with Marshall and Calloway, therefore making them a top regional team.
In the end, I believe, and you do too, that Calloway was the best team and the best team won the tournament.


I don't know what the best answer is, and I'm not sure that a class system would be better either, but I lean to the side of the small school and those athletes that would not otherwise have an opportunity to play on the Murray State floor. And occasionally, those are the schools that create the best stories for the fans and you, the sports reporter.